Comments on: ‘Bill’ of Fare https://lookonline.com/bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams A New York Fashion Industry E-Zine Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:05:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: wacks https://lookonline.com/bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams/#comment-484 Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:28:09 +0000 https://dailyfashionreport.com/bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams/#comment-484 good styles.
female models

]]> By: Anonymous https://lookonline.com/bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams/#comment-345 Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:36:23 +0000 https://dailyfashionreport.com/bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams/#comment-345 You get what you are paid for.

]]> By: Marina Garnier https://lookonline.com/bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams/#comment-344 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:59:41 +0000 https://dailyfashionreport.com/bill-of-fare-in-bill-cunninghams/#comment-344 Note to Marilyn Kirshner:

Yes Bill Cunningham does not seek the limelight and is a real photographer, not a vacuously self promoting clown like Patrick McMullan.

It is ironic that the Times published yet another flattering dumb article about McMullan last Thursday in the Styles page , almost verbatim the same piece that appeared about 10 years ago. If Bill was a double dipping social climbing pseudo snapper who produces page after page of grip and grim shots he would never be allowed to have his own party page.

]]>