<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: On Thin Ice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lookonline.com/on-thin-ice-it-certainly-g_116561739355782112/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lookonline.com/on-thin-ice-it-certainly-g_116561739355782112/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-thin-ice-it-certainly-g_116561739355782112</link>
	<description>A New York Fashion Industry E-Zine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 17:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rashunda		</title>
		<link>https://lookonline.com/on-thin-ice-it-certainly-g_116561739355782112/#comment-206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rashunda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dailyfashionreport.com/on-thin-ice-it-certainly-g_116561739355782112/#comment-206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow. As a woman who aspires to enter fashion journalism - and who certainly does not fit the &quot;in&quot; look you described - I wish I&#039;d read your column before paying the US$59 subscriber fee. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I must disagree with you. Quite a few styles I&#039;ve seen on this side of the pond look absolutely horrible on stick-thin women. Designers who design *only* for thin women do so due to elitism, laziness and a lack of ability to think outside the box. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What would happen if some of them actually studied classic patternmaking and fashion design history? Yikes, they may actually learn to design &quot;against the grain&quot; (excuse the pun).  And who would want to do that?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So much for independent fashion journalism. Lookonline.com seems to be toeing the party line just like the rest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. As a woman who aspires to enter fashion journalism &#8211; and who certainly does not fit the &#8220;in&#8221; look you described &#8211; I wish I&#8217;d read your column before paying the US$59 subscriber fee. </p>
<p>I must disagree with you. Quite a few styles I&#8217;ve seen on this side of the pond look absolutely horrible on stick-thin women. Designers who design *only* for thin women do so due to elitism, laziness and a lack of ability to think outside the box. </p>
<p>What would happen if some of them actually studied classic patternmaking and fashion design history? Yikes, they may actually learn to design &#8220;against the grain&#8221; (excuse the pun).  And who would want to do that?</p>
<p>So much for independent fashion journalism. Lookonline.com seems to be toeing the party line just like the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
